Cultural Phenomenon of the Celebrity: Hermeneutic Analysis

Cultural Phenomenon of the Celebrity Hermeneutic Analysis in the altogether paths of cerebration substructure oft illuminate new ideas that would non come to light reading our conventional and most natural modes of reasoning. We dirty dog be strained in dynamic ways by altering our methods or surfacees to our studying. Several methods of earn in minding include exploration of the unconscious, symbolic systems, radical Synthesis, hermeneutic analysis, among others. For me, the hermeneutic constitute of thinking has the most unsettling effect upon my mind. A hermeneutic approach has experience a revival in recent time in the wake of influential thinkers such as Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, and others. These hold a signifi potbellyt place in the present intellectual climate in the western world. For this essay, I decided to use a hermeneutic approach to analyze a limited cultural phenomenon. Cultural phenomena are of brisk importance for study since they represen t aspects of military man nature (en masse) that are insurmountable to extrapolate independently. Not precisely are they raise to study, but they avow continual interest for elites and common people alike. It is non a stretch to state that these phenomena successfully capture the populations imagination. In this particular essay, I depart come kayoed at the cultural phenomena of the distinction using hermeneutic analysis. The hermeneutical way of thinking, in this case, wont apply to a effrontery text but rather to the loving phenomenon of creditdom. By thinking or so social phenomena in a hermeneutical way, one can look at a subject that rarely gets such scrutiny and hopefully begin to contract understanding as to why our societies are so enthralled by the eminence narrative. The development of a new form of reputationdom can be understood in a new way by understanding the context, audience, media sources, and other hermeneutical detailors. First of all, we will b egin to think about the context of celebrities in the past.Thither has most obviously been a shift in Western Society in the development of the distinction. It has not been an overnight shift by any means, but it has been significant. The most spectacular example of recent changes in the nature of celebrity is the professional celebritya celebrity with little reason to be revered or famous. The prime example would be the infamous Paris Hilton. Although a luminary heiress to her parents fortune, she has flex a celebrity in her own right through egotism-promotion. There are countless heirs to non-homogeneous fortunes that will never be cognise. This kind of character, however, is unprecedented, even in the twentieth century. Most celebrities came into being through any(prenominal) sort of accomplishment, i.e. film, music, politics, sports, etc. Or, they became celebrities by association, such as royalty. The amount of insurance reporting al solidificationted to celebrity-esq ue story nervous strains has grown exponentially. wide-cut television have a bun in the ovens are devoted to the ceaseless coverage of celebritys lives. A whole subclass of photography has developed in the paparazzi, known for being the epitome of the dog-eat-dog line of work. Not to mention the countless tabloids that line the newsstands. These are some of the basic contextual factors that surround the modern celebrity phenomenon.Another factor for thinking about this social phenomenon is the audience. The audience for the development of new celebrities that must be analyzed if one is to use a hermeneutical strategy. The audience for more than of celebrity press and concern has puffyly not changed in type, but likely has changes in how broad the appeal is. It would father been impossible to imagine that Clark Gables individualized life would bring forth been known or a concern for Middle East juvenility fifty years ago. Today, however, in all corners of the world they not o nly know the names of key celebrities but in like manner their storylines of gossip. I consider being asked in a remote village in Albania about the future of J-Lo and Ben Afflecks relationship if they got married. Obviously this change has a lot to do with the digital revolutionopening up a heavy(p) part of the world to a previously unknown celebrity world. It also betrays the fact that the same phenomenon is at work in these non-Western countries as is here in the West.Knowledge and a pursuit of info about Western celebrities could also reveal an admiration of the culture of celebrities by the non-West, but often times these elements remain even in countries predisposed to hate the west. Although many another(prenominal) citizens of these said countries likely separate the politics and the culture of the West, a large majority still do not. There is an effect of cant help but look type psychology in regards to coverage of celebrities. Just like in the West, many in these soc ieties likely think the coverage is superfluous and or wrong. Although a judgment has been made concerning the lustiness and morality of celebrity coverage many remain to have a working knowledge of the ins and outs of Hollywood love life. These stories seem to do something for us en masse.Using further hermeneutical strategies, we will now turn to the sources for the coverage of celebrity gossip and the like. If one is to exit the supermarket on a infractn day he or she is given the opportunity to be fleetly educated in celebritydom. The print media is a key source of information on celebrities. This seems to be chiefly centered on magazines the newspaper mass medium seems to inadequately address the goals of celebrity coverage. The magazine provides the opportunity for vivid pictures, downhearted pithy input, and quick entertainment. It is glitzy, stylish, and most of all fast. Whereas one may fatality to have some backround in Middle Eastern politics in lodge to find part s of the newspaper engaging, the celebrity magazine can bring the glamour and scandal of the celebrity phenomenon with little or no education. The celebrity magazine is an odd mix of posed shots of red rug entries into conglomerate galas, possibly a celebrity interview/photo shoot, and scandalizing pictures large-hearted provided by the paparazzi. This seems to be a winning combination of glamour, personal interest, and scandal.The certify main conduit for the celebrity phenomenon is the television medium. As mentioned before, E is an entire channel devoted to the coverage of celebrity life. This is not to mention the countless celebrity news shows, and their subsequent spoofs. Celebrity news shows use a kindred format compared to that of their magazine cousins. The show usually features some sort of personal interaction with a celebrity, praising the glamour or character of a particular celebrity, and (of course) the mandatory scandal. These shows have produced celebrities in their own right out of the mere reporting on celebrities. The prime example is Ryan Seacrest. Seacrest is the epitome of the net host, having hosted the top twenty for years on a radio site in Los Angeles, been an E anchor, and most famously the host of American Idol. Seacrest has beget a celebrity by merely reporting on celebrities. some(prenominal) media typesthat of magazine and t.v.have worked in conjunction. One reports on the other and fault versa. One makes the other.Using a hermeneutical strategy to look at the social phenomenon of the celebrity has brought to light several pro lay down new ideas for me. The first is what celebrity coverage does for us. I have come to the death at various times that humans have at all times essential a common narrative in their social relationships. In old age gone by, this narrative could be geted by regional insular concerns. A village would find a bond in the fact that their story was divided up, they lived close to one another, m arried into each others families, etc. The gossip and glory of a small town would sustain its people. heretofore, as society has diversified, fragmented, pluralized, etc. it has lost that local connection that is springy for human connection. At the most basic social level, we need something to clack abouta common ground. Human connection is essential for the prospering of human life. Celebrity coverage, professional sports, and other modern social phenomena anticipate to fill that void. In a time when we increasingly find our human contact in less connected or natural ways, such coverage give us a cultural common ground. We can gripe about the fortunes of Liverpool or quip about the Beckham family to absolute strangers and they will likely be able to track with our line of thought. Celebrity narratives give us a common ground for humor, social reflection, and allusions. In order to have fulfilling communication we must have some sort of shared story, even if these stories are plastic in nature. Our society has inevitably become more diverse, global, and connected. This has inevitably lead to an erosion of parochial concerns, and pushed us to socially evolve in order to maintain human connection. We have found common social narrative in the celebrity. Their story has become a common story for us. Their divorces, their cheating, their success, their money, etc., have all become a commentary about our own lives. This line of thought leads me to an additional hermeneutic conclusion concerning celebrity coverage and its reflective nature.We are not interested in celebrities just because they happen to be successful but because they are reflective. Celebrities embody our hopes and dreams, fears and pitfalls, and desire for detachedness. The populace not only celebrates celebrity success, but also celebrates celebrity failure. There is a lust for failure as much as there is for success in the interest in these lives. It is interesting to note that the most fa mous celebrities are those where there are stir portions success and failure. This is important. Without adjoining failure these celebrities fail to capture peoples imagination. Too much success and too much failure twain trigger a lose of interest in the given celebrity. Celebrities find themselves in a proverbial catch-22, trying to allow promotion period not being raked through the coals. The most successful in this look on have allowed both. The reality about celebrity coverage is that we are not interested because these people are necessarily glamorous (there are a lot of unknown glamorous people to be found). We are interested because celebrities create for us a narrative for self reflection and self understanding.Having used hermeneutical techniques such as analyzing the context, audience, media sources, etc., I have come to some interesting new ideas and understanding about a key phenomenon in our societythe celebrity. In previous times, I have been rather fuddle as to why we care so much about these lives. Yet after thinking about the topic using hermeneutical analysis, I have come to several profound reasons as to why this is so.