Pittsburgh Youth Study Essay

According to the Pittsburgh Youth work conducted by Katharine Browning, Ph.D., and Rolf Loeber, Ph.D., it was found that there atomic number 18 multiple factors that are attached with youth crime. The objective of the study was to determine the factors in crime conflict and other cerebrate demeanors (Browning & Loeber, 1999). Those involved in the study consisted of tierce groupings of boys, and they were discover at bottom the duration of almost ten years (Browning & Loeber, 1999). The study group included a random selection of first, fourth and seventh graders. To fuck off with, Browning and Loeber (1999) found that Afri dismiss-Ameri empennage boys were more given to juvenile delinquency than their Caucasian counterparts. It was as well discovered that as widespread delinquency increased, so did the frequency. Again, the percentage for African-American boys were higher than Caucasian ones. Moreover, the study showed that delinquent behaviors followed a certain patte rn what began as a less serious behavior eventually progressed to a more serious one (Browning & Loeber, 1999). Browning and Loeber (1999) listed three pathways which categorized the evils, all of which displayed the shift from a less serious offense equal lying to a more serious act analogous property damage or fighting. More importantly, the study determined deuce factors that causes juvenile offense. The first one was innate forces, internal factors such as intelligent quotient (IQ) and personality (Browning & Loeber, 1999). The second factor was external forces, which consists of family members and friends (Browning & Loeber, 1999). The external forces were contained within different environments, such as the school and home (Browning & Loeber, 1999). The study in addition came across some individual risk factors (Browning & Loeber, 1999). First, it was found that careless behaviors were related to delinquency (Browning & Loeber, 1999). Other factors that contributed to deli nquency include intelligence quotient and socioeconomic placement (Browning & Loeber, 1999). Second, delinquents were found to have low threshold for negative feelings, and were more prone to an impulsive manner (Browning & Loeber, 1999). Aside from these, there were other risk factors like depression and guilt (Browning & Loeber, 1999). Browning and Loeber also determined how family factors are also related to delinquency. Poor supervision is a major element in delinquency specialised examples include the repercussions of physical punishments and inadequate communication in the midst of parents and sons (Browning & Loeber, 1999). Other family risk factors include low socioeconomic status, bad similarity and exposure to social services (Browning & Loeber, 1999). Moreover, it was found that broken families also caused delinquency (Browning & Loeber, 1999). The findings of the study provided the authorities with warning signs to look out for in authority delinquents. In my opinio n, the government should take these findings and work out a platform to avoid further delinquency. According to the findings, the most prone to delinquency are those with low socioeconomic status, those with family problems, and African-American boys. The government should then focus their efforts to these specific categories. For instance, they can hold summer camps for African-American youth, where they can instill commanding values so that they would not go astray. They should provide seminars for parents, so that they can be more effective in their parenting and communicating with their children. Since delinquency can be traced to ones socioeconomic status, the government should create venues for the gain of ones social standing. These findings are extremely helpful in stopping youth delinquency, and the government should take advantage of these to effect change.ReferencesBrowning, K., & Loeber, R. (1999). Highlights of findings from the Pittsburgh youth study. OJJDP Fact She et, 95.